 | 
Parenthood is not a license to kill.
– 05-20-05 –
The books I'm recommending this week are anything reliable about communism, logic, and/or why you might prefer life in America to life in a nation-wide
slave camp. Let's throw in a good dictionary just for good measure.
I received an email the other day about a piece that
lawyer-writer Hank Holzer had published at FrontPage Magazine. His article reminds us that it has
been five years since the innocent Cuban child Elián Gonzalez was sent back to Cuba at the behest of the morally turpitudinous Clinton Administration and the creature that was his Attorney
General.
You remember the saga. The mom had fled Cuba with her
son on one of those creaky boats, and died getting here. Elián was turned over to loving relatives
in Miami. Fidel Castro decided to make a big deal out of the loss of his communist stewardship of
this boy. After much highly public wrangling, including a visit to the U.S by Elián's father and a
few unfortunate PR missteps by the relatives struggling to save Elián, the Reno Thugs came for
the boy, abducted him, and shipped him back to Cuba. All's well that end's well, right? Well...
For a while I did nothing about Holzer's reminder,
regarding the matter as too sad to think about. But then I decided, screw it, the people who
pushed for this kid's re-enslavement should be reminded of what they did. And who knows?
Maybe if we decline to forget about Elián, the chances that he may yet escape, or that others in
his situation will not be turned back, will increase. So here is the initial post of the thread I
initiated at the Daily Pundit site:
START OF POST
A depressing anniversary: it's been five years since the
Reno kidnapping of Elián Gonzalez and his forcible return to Cuba.
Hank Holzer, the lawyer who succeeding in saving the
freedom of an earlier young escapee from tyranny, Walter Polovchak, has a comment about it at
FrontPage Magazine. As one could have predicted, as was predicted, Elián is living
his life under the nose of the dictator, and being used as a propaganda tool. He has "voiced his
support" for the communist regime. Who knows whether the kid is pragmatically lying or has
been brainwashed.
...It has now been five long years since Elián was "reunited" with his grandparents, father
and other relatives. How is he doing? A Castro-friendly article by Vanessa Bauza, bylined
Cardenas, Cuba, recently reported that Elián has finished psychotherapy "to help him cope
with the stress of his ordeal" (read: "reeducation"), several plainclothes security officers
"are stationed in front of Elián's home to keep strangers from getting too close" (read: to
prevent interviews with unfriendly journalists), and, in a perverse consequence of that
family reunification, "Castro takes a special interest in [Elián's] schooling." Indeed, Elián's
father – a waiter who somehow was elected to the Communist National Assembly
– "is often seen in the front row of government-organized rallies, sometimes
accompanied by Elián" (read: propaganda tools). And, as the Associated Press reported
yesterday, finally Elián has been trotted out by Castro's PR machine to laud the
Communist dictator and his tyrannical regime.
Even now, five years after his kidnapping, there
are several lessons to be drawn from the Elián Gonzalez story. But for those of us who
fought the successful battle to save Walter and waged the unsuccessful battle to save
Elián, none speaks as loudly as this: Although "family values" are important, and while
children usually belong with their parents, a clear line protecting the child must be drawn
when, as in Elián's case, parental custody is inimical to a child's best interests -- a lesson
too many conservatives have yet to learn. It was the failure of many conservatives to have
learned that lesson that contributed to Elián Gonzalez losing his freedom and becoming a
ward of the Cuban state and its dictator, Fidel Castro.
I would only add that "family values" conservatives
weren't the only "champions of liberty" urging the feds to pitch this kid back into the maw...this,
even after the father had arrived in the United States and could easily have remained here. Why
didn't he? Either: 1) he actually wanted his child to be returned to a life under communism, which
is about as thoroughgoing a betrayal of a son by a father one can imagine; or 2) other family
members back in Cuba were being held hostage, and Elián's return was the ransom that had to
be paid to secure their safety. Either way, you tell me how it made sense for Bitch Reno to storm
the gates of the Miami compound of Elián's American relatives and "rescue" Elián from American
freedom.
END OF POST
So what do you think the response to the above post
was? Yes, some readers ratified my position. But others iterated the same jive jabber that did so
much to enable the ejection of Elián five years ago. And without bothering to counter either
Holzer's observations or mine. "A child belongs with his parents." How often had we heard that
muddled mantra five years ago?
What one must wonder: Is it the view of such exponents
of Elián-destruction, then, that no matter what actions a parent might want to take against his
child, he should be allowed to take them unhindered? Is the child without any rights except those
that might be vouchsafed to him by a parent? Seemingly so, on this view. Parenthood, on this
view, is a license to kill. I disagree.
If you want the rest of the thread you can visit the
Daily Pundit site.
Copyright 2005 by David M. Brown. Brown is a freelance
writer and editor. To view previous installments of this column,
click here.
Books to Read
- The Black Book of Communism by Stephane Courtois et al.
Communism: A History by Richard Pipes
What's So Great About America by Dinesh D'Souza
The Case of the Cockamamie Killer by David Blade
|
|